Category Archives: Tech

Google I/O 2014 Recap: Android, Knowledge Graph and more

Back in April, I was lucky enough to get a partner invite for Google I/O. Coupled with a stay at the Startup House, a co-working / housing space (ideal when you’re jet-lagged at 4AM and want a proper desk to code a few meters away from your bed) located only one black away from Moscone, I’m very glad I’ve made the trip to my first I/O!

Google I/O after hours party in Yerba Buena Gardens
Google I/O after hours party in Yerba Buena Gardens

Here are a few highlights, in a conference which clearly confirmed the role of (1) Android as a global OS, and (2) the Knowledge Graph as a hub for everything AI-related, at Google and beyond.

Most of the videos of the sessions are online on Google Developers’ YouTube channel, and I’ve tried as much as possible to link to the relevant ones below.

Android – One OS to rule them all

While I’m not (yet) a full-time Android user (let alone a developer), it’s now clear that it goes far beyond a phone-only OS. With the introduction of AndroidWear, AndroidCar, and AndroidTV during the keynote, the OS is now the core of all hardware-related initiatives at Google.

With common SDKs and API to interact with, wherever the OS is used, this makes the life of developers much easier when building cross-devices products. Relying on a single ecosystem is also of importance when building an engineering team, and I guess it may also be an decision factor for small start-ups when deciding which market to tackle.

Last but not least, the improvements in the OS itself, including a new runtime – see “What’s new in Android“, makes it even faster then before, a plus for embedded systems of all sorts.

Google’s Knowledge Graph – From search to voice controls and app indexing

So far, Google’s Knowledge Graph has been used mostly in search-related projects, including the snippets you can see when searching for entities such as places, people, music and movies on Google. Several sessions-cases showed how it is now used as a central hub for AI-related projects and products.

Search results getting richer with Google's Knowledge Graph
Search results getting richer with Google’s Knowledge Graph

Using Android TV, you can ask your TV (literally, by talking to your Android watch) to suggest an Oscar-awarded movie from 2000, or who’s casting in X or Y – all answers coming from the Knowledge Graph.  In the first case, results can be bought from Google play, another nice piece of integration between the different offerings from the company.

Another interesting case is the use if the Knowledge Graph to connect the dots between previously isolated silos, namely mobile apps. One of the common issue with those apps is their lack of links and outside-world connections, in spite of recent efforts such as Facebook-supported App Links. In the session “The Future of Apps and Search“, a combination of app indexing, JSON-LD and Knowledge Graph was presented to directly link into an app from, e.g., Google’s search results or autocompletion-search in Android, as well as launching actions from search results – e.g. playing a track in Spotify, a use-case announced a few days before I/O - using the new schema.org actions I’ve recently blogged about.

As an early JSON-LD enthusiast, and working on related technologies for almost a decade, you can’t imagine how excited I was when I saw this in something used by million of users! Let’s bet that’s only the beginning, and that new verticals will follow.

Spotify, with real bits of JSON-LD inside
Spotify, with real bits of JSON-LD inside

Google Cloud and DataFlow – Smarter, faster, easier

I’ve been recently using Google Cloud infrastructure in several projects (from GAE to Google Prediction - watch “Predicting the future with the Google Cloud Platform” for more about their ML infrastructure), and a few announcements made my day here:

  • Cloud Debugger - making DevOps and back-engineers more efficient when debugging code. You can now add breakpoints, including conditional ones (e.g. user=X) in your live app, without jeopardising its speed, and most important, without having to stop/restart/deploy anything. This means that code can be debugged on production servers with live data, and  without patching / tracing multiple boxes,  all in the comfort of your browser. A kind of New Relic on steroids, so big thumbs-up here!
  • Dataflow –  aiming to replace MapReduce, with a special focus on stream processing and scalability. A convincing use-case during the keynote was Twitter sentiment analysis, showing not only the simplicity of the interface, but also the orchestration of the services through the API. The service is not open yet, but you can check “Big data, the Cloud Way: Accelerated and simplified” to know more. I’m looking forward to try it on a few stream processing for content discovery!
Dataflow - Coming soon to a theater near you
Dataflow – Coming soon to a theater near you

The Web platform – Polymer, WebRTC and HTML5

Whether you’re accessing if from your desktop, phone, or now, your watch or Glass, there’s only one Web. And far from just websites, it can be used as a platform to build powerful apps, as many session focused on:

  • Polymer / Web components – or how to build your own HTML tags for quick prototyping and distribution. As an AngularJS user, I was immediately convinced by its two-way data bindings. Polymer (“Polymer and the Web Components revolution“) adds another elegant layer to the Web, allowing to define tags that are then rendered as full components. Imagine a <my-recent-tracks> tag that will automatically render the top-tracks you’ve played on all your favorite music platforms. Well, that’s exactly what Polymer can do;
  • HTML5 – the Web as a platform, from different perspectives. In particular, “HTML5 everywhere: How and why YouTube uses the Web platform” was a great intro talk to understand the benefits of HTML5 from different points of view: UX, scalability, cross-platform. Recommended to anyone who still have doubts about it.
  • WebRTC – building real-time systems in your browser. “Making music mobile with the Web” not only showed how to transform your Macbook into a Marshall JCM2000 with Soundtrap, but also how WebRTC was used for real-time collaborative music creation, with very low latency.

Wearables – It’s all about the UX

Then, a big part of the conference: Glass and smart watches. I often thought that most of the effort to build those was put in the hardware and OS side of things (reducing footprint, optimising battery life, gathering sensor data, etc.).

While some talks clearly focused on this (with some nice hacks such as back-camera for biking in “Innovate with the Glass Platform“, and football-related ones), I was impressed by “Designing for wearables“, which focused on the role of UX to make sure wearables are devices that let you connect, and not interfere with the world as a phone does.

Paris Saint-Germain represents at I/O 2014!
Paris Saint-Germain represents at I/O 2014!

Showing some early prototypes and discussing how and why Glass / wear notifications are so minimalistic, this was an inspiring session for anyone interested in UX and products. A must-watch for developers and entrepreneurs aiming to  build appealing user-facing products, whether it’s for wearables or more standard devices.

Google+ – Or how Google missed the spot

I may have missed it from other sessions, but none of the ones I’ve been to mentioned Google+. I was not expecting much about it at I/O since the departure of Vic Gundotra, and Sergey Brin’s statements, as well as a plus-free agenda. Still, that was a big surprise, as it would have been a no-brainer use-case in many talks.

Using dataflow to process streams from your social circles? Not a word about it. Using Glass to see what your friends are posting? Nope. Alerts on your Google TV to binge watch some TV-show together with your friends home 5000km away? Neither.

G+ could have been an awesome social network – or should I say a social platform. Combined with Freebase / Knowledge Graph, linking people to things they like, possibilities would be endless in terms of profiling, discovery and more. Yet, with a poor API, a lack of portability that could have differentiate it from its main competitors from Day 1 (imagine PubSubHubbub / WebSocket as an easy way to integrate G+ into other platforms), I’m sad they’ve missed the spot.

Up to 2015?

Overall, a great conference, in spite of the queue mismatch that forced me to miss about 30min of the keynote, queueing twice around the Moscone, a real shame when you travel 8000km for such an event.

I particularly enjoyed the focus around the 3D topics (Design, Develop, Distribute), the diversity of talks (watch the awesome “Robotics in a new world – Presented by Women Techmakers“), and the accessibility of the DevRel team between sessions at the Developer sandboxes.

Looking forward to the next one!

About these ads

Enhancing the Freebase/YouTube API mappings… using Freebase and YouTube

The YouTube V3 API is one of those thing you’ll definitely fall in love with, if you’re into real-world Semantic Web applications, a.k.a “Things, not words”. With its integration with Freebase - the core of Google’s Knowledge Graph -, it’s a concrete and practical showcase of the Web as a distributed database of things and relations, and not only keywords and links between pages.

YouTube Data API v3 with Freebase mappings: the good, the bad, and the ugly

While relatively simple to use, it provides advanced features to let developers built data-driven applications. On the one hand, it allows to search for videos by Freebase entities, as you can try in a recent demo from YouTube themselves. On the other hand, it returns which entities are used/described in a video.

Yet, identifying topics from videos is a difficult task, and if you’re not convinced (and interested in all things Machine Learning related), check the following Google I/O talk from last year.

Google I/O talk on Semantic Annotations of YouTube videos, featuring our own seevl
Google I/O talk on Semantic Annotations of YouTube videos, featuring our own seevl

While the API generally delivers correct information, it sometimes requires a bit of work to automatically uses its results in a music-related context (to be exact, the issues might be in the underlying data, rather then on the API itself):

  • In some cases, it provides multiple artists – which is often correct, e.g. Blondie and Debby Harry but makes difficult to find who’s the main one, as the API delivers them at the same level (topicIds).
  • In others, it returns empty results, like this (recently deleted, maybe as part of the YouTube music limbo?) Nirvana video.
  • Finally, when an awesome band like Weezer decides to cover Coldplay, both bands are returned by the API.

This is something we’ve improved to build our former seevl for YouTube plug-in, and while it’s not available anymore, as we’ve moved away from consumer-facing products to refocus on a B2B, turn-key, music discovery solution, I’ve decided to open source the underlying library to find who’s playing and what (yes, that’s music only) in any YouTube videos.

Introducing youplay – who’s and what’s playing in a YouTube music video

The result is youplay, available on PyPI and github, a MIT-licensed python library that works as an enhancement on top of the YouTube Data API v3 to automatically identify who’s and what’s playing in a music video. It uses different heuristics, data look-up, and more to find the correct artists if multiple ones are returned (unless they’re all playing in the video, like this RHCP + Snoop Dogg version of Scar Tissue), to filter ambiguous ones, or to find the correct artist and track if the API doesn’t deliver anything.

Here’s an example

#!/usr/bin/env python
import youplay

(artists, tracks) = youplay.extract('0UjsXo9l6I8')
print '%s - %s' %(', '.join([artist.name for artist in artists]), tracks[0].name)

(artists, tracks) = youplay.extract('c-_vFlDBB8A')
print '%s - %s' %(artists[0].name, tracks[0].name)

will return

(env)marvin-7:youplay alex$ python sample.py
Jay-Z, Alicia Keys - Empire State of Mind
Dropkick Murphys - Worker's Song

The tool is also packaged with a command line script returning JSON data for easy integration into non-python apps.

(env)marvin-7:youplay alex$ ./bin/youplay ebBjGp7QOGc
{
  "tracks": [
    {
      "mid": "/m/0dt1kzp", 
      "name": "For My Family"
    }
  ], 
  "artists": [
    {
      "mid": "/m/022tqm", 
      "name": "Agnostic Front"
    }
  ]
}

With a little help from my friends

The fun part? All the look-ups (if any) are using the Freebase and YouTube API themselves, such as:

  • Finding the top-tracks of an artist from Freebase and matching it with the video name if the original API call when it returns only artist names;
  • Identifying if a song has been recorded by multiple artists;
  • Looking-up related YouTube videos to identify what’s the common topic between all of them, and guess the current artist of a video with no API-results.

Isn’t it a nice way to bridge the gap?

Even though I hope the API will be useful to other music-tech developers, I also wish that it soon becomes obsolete, as Google’s Knowledge Graph, and other structured-data efforts on the Web, keep growing on the Web in terms of AI, infrastructures and APIs/toolkits – making more and more easier every day to build data-driven applications (if only I had this 10years ago when I started digging into the topic!).

Oh, and I’m attending Google I/O next week, and if you’re working on similar projects, ping me and let’s have a chat!

echoplot – Plot song loudness using the EchoNest API

As I’m working on the second part of my analysis of the Rolling Stone 500 Greatest songs of all time, I needed to draw the loudness representation of various songs extracted from the EchoNest API. I’ve been using mathplotlib with pyechonest, and as the process is quite repetitive, I’ve packaged everything as echoplot, so you can easily plot song loudness using the EchoNest API.

pip install echoplot

Once you’ve setup your EchoNest API key as an environemnt variable ECHO_NEST_API_KEY, just run echoplot

marvin-7:~ alex$ echoplot -h
usage: echoplot [-h] [-s START] [-e END] artist title

Plot loudness of a song using the EchoNest API.

positional arguments:
  artist                the song's artist, e.g. 'The Clash'
  title                 the song's title, e.g. 'London Calling'

optional arguments:
  -h, --help            show this help message and exit
  -s START, --start START
                        start analysis at a given time (seconds)
  -e END, --end END     end analysis at a given time (seconds)

For example

marvin-7:~ alex$ echoplot 'The Clash' 'London Calling'
The Clash - London Calling
The Clash – London Calling

or

marvin-7:~ alex$ echoplot Radiohead 'Paranoid Android'
Radiohead - Paranoid Android
Radiohead – Paranoid Android

The plot also displays the different segments of the song (chorus, verse, etc.), also provided by the EchoNest API. Echoplot’s source code is on github and the package is on PyPI.

The new schema.org actions: What they mean for personalisation on the Web

The schema.org initiative just announced the release of a new action vocabulary. As their blog post emphasises:

The Web is not just about static descriptions of entities. It is about taking action on these entities.

Whether they’re online or offline, publishing those actions in a machine-readable format follows TimBL’s “Weaving the Web” vision of the Web as a social machine.

It’s even more relevant when the online and the offline world become one, whether it’s through apps (4square, Uber, etc.) or via sensors and wearable tech (mobile phones, Glass, etc.). A particular aspect I’m interested in is how those actions can help to personalise the Web

The rise of dynamic content and structured data on the Web

This is not the first time actions – at least online ones –  are used on the Web: think of Activity StreamsWeb Intents, as well as SIOC-Actions that I’ve worked on with Pierre-Antoine Champin a few years ago.

Yet, considering the recent advances on structured Web data (schema.org, Google’s Knowledge Graph, Facebook OpenGraph, Twitter cards…), this addition is a timely move. Every one can now publish their actions using a shared vocabulary, meaning that apps and services can consume them openly – pending the correct credentials and privacy settings. And that’s a big move for personalisation.

Personalising content from distributed data

Let’s consider my musical activity. Right now, I can plug my services into Facebook and use the Graph API to retrieve my listening history. Or query APIs such as the Deezer one. Or check my Twitter and Instagram feeds to remember some of the records I’ve put on my turntable. Yet, if all of them would publish actions using the new ListenAction type, I could use a single query engine to get the data from those different endpoints.

Deezer could describe actions using the following JSON-LD, and Spotify with RDFa, but it doesn’t really matter – as both would agree on shared semantics through a single vocabulary.

<scripttype="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context":"http://schema.org",
  "@type":"ListenAction",
  "agent":{
    "@type":"Person",
    "name":"Alex"
  },
  "object":{
    "@type":"MusicGroup",
    "name":"The Clash"
  },
  "instrument":{
    "@type":"WebApplication", 
    "name":"Deezer",
    "url":"http://deezer.com"
  } 
} </script>

Ultimately, that means that every service could gather data from different sources to meaningfully extract information about myself, and deliver a personalised experience as soon as I log-in.

You might think that Facebook enables this already with the Graph API. Indeed, but data need to be in Facebook. This is not always the case, either because the seed services haven’t implemented – or removed – the proper connectors, or because you didn’t allow them to share your actions.

In this new configuration, I could decide, for every service I log-in, which sources it can access. Log-in to a music platform? Let’s access to my Deezer and Spotify profiles, where some schema.org Actions can be found. Booking a restaurant? Check my OpenTable ones. From there, those services can quickly build my profile and start personalising my online experience.

In addition, websites could decide to use background knowledge to enrich one’s profile, using vertical databases, e.g. Factual for geolocation data or our recently relaunched seevl API for music meta-data, combining with advanced heuristics such as such as time decay, actions-objects granularity and more to enhance the profiling capabilities (if you’re interested in the topic, check the slides of Fabrizio Orlandi’s Ph.D. viva on the topic) .

Privacy matters

This way of personalising content could also have important privacy implications. By selecting which sources a service can access, I implicitly block access to data that is non-relevant or too private for that particular service – as opposed to granting access to all my content.

Going further, we can imagine an privacy-control matrix where I can select not only the sources, but also the action types to be used, keeping my data safe and avoiding freakomendations. I could provide my 4square eating actions (restaurants I’ve checked-in) to a food website, but offer my musical background (concerts I’ve been to) to a music app, keeping both separate.

Of course, websites should be smart enough to know which action they require, doing a source/action pre-selection for me. This could ultimately solve some of the trust issues often discussed when talking about personalisation, as Facebook’s Sam Lessin addressed in his keynote on the future of travel.

What’s next?

As you could see, I’m particularly interested in what’s going to happen with this new schema.org update, both from the publishers and the consumers point of view.

It will also be interesting to see how mappings could emerge between it and the Facebook Graph API, adding another level of interoperability in this quest to make the Web a social space.

SeatTrip – concert listing for your next trip (or “seatwave meets tripit”)

Another week-end, another MusicHackDay. This time, I’ve tried to new APIs:

  • seatwave – that just launched few days and that gives access to a wide range of events, including (obviously) concerts. Search by location, time-frame, venue (including coordinates!), and redirect to seatwave website to get event tickets. Interestingly, they do rev-share if some tickets are bought in one’s app using their API.
  • SendGrid – cloud-based e-mail services. Sending mails, but also – the most interesting part – receiving ones and parsing them. Simply configure a MX, a callback URL, and parse any incoming e-mail, including header, content and attachements – all in a REST-ful way

So, with those 2 APIs in mind, I’ve build SeatTrip – it’s like seatwave meets tripit. Send your plane ticket by e-mail, and get a listing of events that will happen in the area a few minutes later.

Sending a AerLingus ticket about a trip to London, I got the following e-mail in my inbox a few minutes later. First, a featured artist. I’m using our own seevl data to identify the featured artist using its meta-data, and display her/his biography.

Featured artist for your next trip!

Then, the listing of all concerts for the city at that time.

All concerts happening during your trip

For each event, it provide additional information from the seatwave API. First, it features a Google Map link to the venue (useful to buy your hotel nearby!).

Use GoogleMap to display the venue map

Also, it links to the seatwave website so that you can directly book your concert – and lists the number of remaining tickets if the show is almost sold-out!

Buy tickets from the seatwave website

Here’s now the fun part, about how this hack works:

  • First, once the e-mail is sent to an address mapped to SendGrip API – a PHP script extracts the location and the timeframe of the trip from the e-mail. The extraction if airline-specific, and so far the hack works only on AerLingus ticket (however, an abstraction layer allows to easily create new wrappers – a similar strategy as used in TripIt).
  • Then, the seatwave API is used to get the list of all events in the area for that period, including all events details.
  • Once we have the events, seevl is used to identify the featured artist from the list of available concerts.
  • Finally, the e-mail id rendered in HTML, and send via SendGrid.

It takes around 2 minutes to do the whole processing, check this short video to see it in action. Note that I changed the trip date as that was an old trip ticket for which seatwave didn’t get any data, and that the video has been cut to avoid the delay of receiving the e-mail with the listing.

Also, don’t forget to check this impressive list of 62 hacks - especially Buddhafy (mind-control for Spotify !) and Concerts2021 – the future of live gigs (or not, thanksfully ;-) !

Mixture – real-word music-discovery

MIDEM HackDay was – as expected – a wonderful event, where 18 hacks have been built over the week-end (screenshots on this MIDEM blog post).

In particular, I’d give my thumbs-up for Tourrent - helping bands to set-up their next tours based on Torrent downloads of their tracks, FlatDrop - Micropayments for Soundcloud tracks, and Badgify - audioscrobbler meets Arduino.

Together with Ian from rd.io and Guillaume from Webdoc, we’ve worked on a new music discovery approach, leveraging real-world data. Various 4-square hacks enabling geolocation-based discovery have been build on previous MHD, so we’ve decided to take another route: take a picture of anything, and play the songs that reference this thing. Whether it’s a bottle, some brown sugar, or a house.

So here’s Mixture, a simple hack / proof-of-concept of the approach, combining APIs from IQ Engines (image recognition – give it a try if you’re looking for something similar, even though queries can be a bit slow), musiXmatch (lyrics identification), rd.io (music streaming) and seevl (artist data). It may still be buggy (we’ll work on it) and some APIs have a daily-rate limit that could block the application, but you should be able to get the overall idea!

About JSON-LD and Content-Negotiation

NB: This post was originally written on blog.seevl.net - I crosspost it here now as I’m starting to blog here again, and I think that’s definitely an approach and a data-serialisation worth using.

I wanted to write about our use of Content-Negotiation for a long time, and as we recently switched to JSON-LD as the unique format to represent our data, I decided to talk about both in this blog post.

As you may know (or can guess when checking the team page), we have been involved in efforts around the Semantic Web and Linked Data for many years, and are big fans of the graph model that these technologies offer. It’s flexible, it’s agile, and it’s a straightforward way to integrate and mash-up data from different sources. But when it comes to providing this data back to developers, things are more complex. One could chose to offer RDF/XML or Turtle, but that generally requires a new skillset. Why ? Because most platforms provide JSON, and developers are consequently more used to this than to other formats. Check in particular these recent stats (slide 22-24) from a talk that John Musser (ProgrammableWeb) gave at SemTech this year.

So, we decided to use JSON-LD for our data, after an initial home-grown JSON-modeling, that was not that far from the current JSON-LD spec. One thing I particularly like is that it enables to send “objects” over the wire rather than as a set of triples. For instance, consider this representation of facts about the Beatles:

{
    "@context": {
        "collaborated_with": "http://purl.org/ontology/mo/collaborated_with",
        "id": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier",
        "origin": "http://purl.org/ontology/mo/origin",
        "prefLabel": "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel",
        "uri": "@subject"
    },
    "collaborated_with": [
        {
            "id": "hSmwe4Dq",
            "prefLabel": "The Quarrymen",
            "uri": "http://data.seevl.net/entity/hSmwe4Dq#id"
        }
    ],
    "origin": [
        {
            "id": "px6UYEPh",
            "prefLabel": "England",
            "uri": "http://data.seevl.net/entity/px6UYEPh#id"
        },
        {
            "id": "xMgUSM9b",
            "prefLabel": "Liverpool",
            "uri": "http://data.seevl.net/entity/xMgUSM9b#id"
        }
    ],
    "prefLabel": "The Beatles",
    "uri": "http://data.seevl.net/entity/pzkVnsbP#id"
}

If you are used to JSON, you probably understand with no additional effort, and can use any JSON toolkit to parse it. If you are aware of the Linked Data principles, you directly see that every entity has its own URI, that can also be accessed to get more infos about it. And if you care about triples, you can use a JSON-LD parser or the public playground, that will understand the @context values to translate this JSON-LD feed into raw triples (using MO and SKOS here). Clearly, the best of both worlds.

Then, Content-negotiation. When using a website and then deciding to develop around it,  I am often frustrated by the need to learn new URLs, new paths, new parameters. Why the hell humans and machines should have different way to access the same data, albeit in different formats ? This is exactly why we rely on Content-negotiation on data.seevl.net. By default, every page is rendered as HTML, but if you ask for JSON, you’ll get a JSON-LD representation of the same entity, separated into different “slices” (infos, link, facts, topics and related artists, as detailed on our dev zone). No need to learn new URIs, no additional paramaters. Just tell us you want JSON, and we’ll serve you what you need !

curl http://data.seevl.net/entity/?prefLabel=beatles
-H "Accept: application/json" -H "X_APP_ID: 1c55b80a"
-H "X_APP_KEY:65e7fbe154e8cee6c1704a9358dd8939"
Of course, we still want users to authenticate and gather metrics about data usage, but content-negotiation (versus a separate api.mydomain.org) does not prevent this at all. We are using 3scale and as opposed to most API-enabler, they do not proxy the API calls. This means that we can simply implement content-negotiation from our side (using our existing URIs), and just call them when authenticating and reporting metrics.
Overall, this combination of Content-negotiation and JSON-LD works like this (plus some other usual suspects such as Django, memcached, ApacheVarnish and Virtuoso - all on AWS)
Content-negotiation + JSON-LD
Content-negotiation + JSON-LD
To conclude this post, there are two things that really matter here:
  • First, WYSIWYM – What You See Is What You Mean. Using JSON-LD, we provide a view of our data directly mapped to our underlying model – in a simple JSON format. This helps to understand of how data is represented and how one can query it later (for example, “reversing” the previous representation to get a list of bands originated from Liverpool)
  • Then, we save costs. By implementing a Content-negotiation strategy, we have a single layer to maintain between users (humans and machines) and our data. That largely simplifies the deployment process, and minimises overhead. Also, every new feature is immediately available from both side with no added cost.
Enjoy a Web designed both for humans and machines. Enjoy a Web of Data.

Timeout for HTML5 localStorage

HTML5 localStorage is a nice way to store data on the client side. However, when using it to cache remote API calls, you may want to purge it from time to time. As per its spec, there’s no way to automatically set-up a timeOut, so here’s a tiny bit of jQuery that does the job:

var hours = 24; // Reset when storage is more than 24hours
var now = new Date().getTime();
var setupTime = localStorage.getItem('setupTime');
if (setupTime == null) {
    localStorage.setItem('setupTime', now)
} else {
    if(now-setupTime > hours*60*60*1000) {
        localStorage.clear()
        localStorage.setItem('setupTime', now);
    }
}

Back to blogging

Well, not really, even though I should find a way to restore all the posts of my previous blog somewhere on that domain.

I’ve setup this Tumblr for random notes, pics, etc. and a few longer posts. Yet, I guess that most of the blogging side will be on http://blog.seevl.net – both from the tech and the business side, discussing what we’re building over there in the music and data space. I’ll try to link them – or crosspost some bits and pieces – from here.